About Us

Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation
Declaration of Ethical Principles and Practices

Adopted December 14, 2004; Revised September 11, 2007


The Trustees and Staff act with integrity in all their internal and external dealings.


The Foundation pursues clearly stated missions and purposes, approved by the Board of Trustees (“Board”), in service of the public good.


The Board is responsible for setting the mission and strategic direction of the Foundation and for overseeing its finances, operations, and policies. The Board:

  • Ensures that each Trustee understands and fulfills his or her governance responsibilities in acting for the benefit of the Foundation and its public purpose, and that both Trustees and Staff have the requisite skills and experience to carry out their duties;
  • Has a conflict-of-interest policy ensuring that any conflicts of interest or the appearance thereof are avoided or appropriately managed through disclosure, recusal, or other means;
  • Is responsible for the selection, evaluation, and performance of the President; conducts regularly scheduled appraisals of the President’s performance; and ensures that the President’s compensation is reasonable and appropriate;
  • Ensures that all transactions and dealings of the Foundation are conducted with integrity and honesty; that the Foundation is fair and inclusive in its hiring and promotion policies and practices for all Board and Staff positions; that policies of the Foundation are in writing, clearly articulated, and officially adopted; and that the resources of the Foundation are responsibly and prudently managed;
  • Approves an annual budget for its current fiscal year, outlining projected expenses for major program activities and administration;
  • Reviews, as part of its annual budget process, the percentages of the Foundation’s resources spent on program and administration;
  • Reviews the annual audit together with the independent auditors, as appropriate; and,
  • Has ultimate authority to award grants.


Trustees and Staff are knowledgeable of and comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and conventions. The Foundation provides adequate training and ongoing legal advice to ensure that the Board and Staff are well informed of relevant legal and regulatory issues.


The Foundation manages funds responsibly and prudently, in keeping with the following considerations:

  • The Foundation spends an appropriate percentage of its annual budget on grants or programs in pursuance of its mission;
  • The Foundation spends appropriately on administration to ensure the effectiveness of accounting systems, internal controls, professional management, and Staff performance;
  • The Foundation compensates Staff reasonably and appropriately;
  • The Foundation prudently draws from endowment funds consistent with donor intent and to support the public purpose of the Foundation; and
  • All financial reports are factually accurate and complete in all material respects.


The Foundation acts prudently with regard to administrative expenses, ensuring that the level of such expenses is consistent with the mission and activities of the Foundation. The Trustees will establish and maintain an administrative-expense policy that:

  • Recognizes that there are publicly available data identifying ranges of typical ratios of administrative expenses to assets or distributions for grantmakers of similar type, asset size, programmatic scope, and geographic area of service.
  • Requires that, if the Foundation’s administrative expense ratio periodically exceeds those norms, the Board will examine the reasons for the variance, determine whether those reasons are valid and, if not, take steps to reduce administrative expenses accordingly.
  • Among the factors that could cause the Foundation’s administrative expenses to exceed the normative range from time-to-time are: whether the Foundation operates programs; the extent of technical assistance and other services it provides to grantees; the extent of its efforts to share its knowledge with grantees and the public; its chosen scope of assessment and evaluation; the nature of its programs or initiatives, and other similar variables relating to the Foundation’s mission and type.


In setting compensation levels, the Trustees and President are mindful of their responsibilities as stewards of charitable funds. Any compensation paid to Trustees, Staff, contractors, consultants and other providers of services is reasonable and commensurate with the individual’s or firm’s responsibilities, time commitment, and duties and services performed. As one measure of reasonableness, the Foundation refers to publicly available data describing typical levels of compensation paid by similar organizations for similar duties in similar circumstances to persons of similar qualifications. The Foundation also maintains job descriptions detailing specific duties and expectations for all Staff members, and reviews those expectations against the actual performance of Staff members on a regular basis, at least once per year.


The Foundation responds in a timely manner to reasonable requests for information and provides comprehensive, accurate, and current information to the public, the media, and all stakeholders.


The Foundation seeks to avoid both conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts that might undermine either the integrity of the Foundation or the public’s trust in the field of organized philanthropy. Trustees and Staff recognize that the Internal Revenue Code prohibits certain kinds of transactions with, or which benefit, “disqualified persons” as defined in the Code and relevant regulations and rulings. With respect to transactions which are not prohibited, Trustees and Staff are mindful of two types of conflicts of interest:

Self-Dealing: The potential for self-dealing arises in any transaction or decision from which a Trustee, Staff member, or other “disqualified person,” including family members of Trustees or Staff, may profit or receive a monetary benefit. A conflict of interest exists when a person having input into a decision could personally benefit, either directly or indirectly, from the outcome of that decision.

Conflict of Loyalty: A conflict of loyalty arises in any transaction or decision in which a Trustee or Staff member is in a position of divided or conflicting loyalties. This occurs when an individual is involved in any personal or business relationship that may significantly influence or bias his or her decision-making ability as a Board or Staff member. Relevant factors in determining a conflict of loyalty include the duration, strength, and intimacy of a given personal or business relationship or affiliation, and its relevance to the functions performed by the individual.

To protect against these two types of conflicts, the Foundation adheres to the following guidelines:

  • Board and Staff members shall not receive any pecuniary gain as a result of any grant made to, or of any contract entered with, any third party by the Foundation.
  • Board and Staff members shall not accept any payments, gifts, loans, trips, or entertainment from organizations or individuals that: (1) have applied for, or received, grants during the preceding three years; (2) might reasonably be expected to apply for a grant in the near future; or (3) provide, or seek to provide, services to the Foundation. Permissible exceptions may include: gifts of nominal value; meals and social invitations that are in keeping with good business ethics and do not obligate the recipient; and payments for serving in an official capacity or for services to other organizations, provided these payments are disclosed to the Board.
  • Board and Staff members shall disclose to the Board all official connections with applicants for grants that do not result in any financial benefit to the Board or Staff member, such as memberships on boards or other voluntary positions with the applicant organization. Staff members shall recuse themselves from reviewing and recommending proposed grants for organizations to which they are connected, provided there are other Staff members who could review and analyze the proposed grant. Board members shall refrain from voting on any grants for organizations to which they are connected, and in addition, in circumstances which present a conflict of loyalty as defined above, an affected Trustee may present information regarding the grant at the request of the Board, but shall recuse himself or herself from deliberation regarding the grant.
  • Board and Staff members shall disclose to the Board all dealings between the Foundation and themselves or any organization in which they have a material interest. Examples of the kinds of dealings that should be disclosed are: sales, transfers or leases of property, loans, furnishings of goods or services and employment of themselves or any family member, including retention of themselves or any family member for professional services. If any such dealings are considered for approval by the Board, the interest of such personnel shall be disclosed to the Board prior to its vote. Any Board or Staff member having an interest in any such dealings, or a conflict of loyalty with respect to such matter, shall recuse himself or herself from deliberation regarding such matter, and shall not vote upon such dealings.


In its employment, Board recruitment, and grantmaking practices, the Foundation will seek to promote inclusiveness and be respectful of the need to be representative of the communities it serves.


Not less than annually, the Board, the President and such other Staff as the Board may wish to include, will discuss whether the Foundation is operating in a manner consistent with these principles and practices. Trustees will take actions as may be appropriate to improve compliance or correct non-compliance.